Visual Operations + Adaptive Skills dogfood
Status
First bounded cross-repository observability checkpoint, recorded on 2026-06-22.
This pilot uses an existing Adaptive Skills capability while evolving AletheIA’s Resource Observatory. It does not add a runtime, collector, telemetry service, or write-back path.
What was exercised
| Layer | Role in this slice |
|---|---|
| AletheIA | Defines the read-only projection boundary and remains the macro-governance layer. |
| Adaptive Skills | Supplies the versioned feature-planning capability used to define the smallest useful integration slice. |
| Mission Control | Adapts the execution record into a sourced Resource Observatory signal. |
The canonical capability source is
feature-planning@0.1.0.
The consumer-owned execution record is
adaptive-skills-feature-planning-dogfood-record.json.
Why the activation gate is satisfied
The Visual Operations phase closeout required a durable, non-sensitive activation record plus a reviewed mapping that preserves AletheIA authority. This checkpoint provides both:
- the checked-in record identifies skill, version, source revision, context, activated modules, result, evidence references, and attribution guess;
governance_authorityis explicitlyfalse;- the adapter rejects records that claim governance authority;
- the Resource Observatory labels the signal as reported trace evidence;
- no prompt, secret, personal data, or restricted source body is stored.
Observable result
The previous synthetic ACT-552 card is replaced by a signal reconstructed from
the execution record:
- label:
Skill usage; - value:
feature-planning; - provenance:
reported; - source:
as-exec-2026-06-22-mission-control-001; - interpretation: activation evidence does not control gates or decisions.
The contextual inspector progressively reveals the execution mode, result, activated modules, handoff posture, and evidence references. These fields explain the activation; they are not converted into a score, recommendation, or gate outcome.
Boundary and follow-up
This is a versioned snapshot integration, not automatic telemetry. The next useful cross-repository step should be another real execution record only when a distinct skill or outcome adds evidence. Repeated records may later justify a collector, but this single checkpoint does not.