Skip to content
AletheIA Docs
Esc
navigateopen⌘Jpreview
On this page

Delivery Output Contract

Goal

This document defines a first future-facing contract for what a generated Alpha 7 delivery output should contain once a bootstrap generator has already made its choices.

In simple terms:

if a future Alpha 7 generator emits a package, this document defines what that emitted package should make visible before a team adopts it.


Current status

This is a doc-level output contract, not an active implementation schema.

Its role today is to make Alpha 7 bounded enough for 1.0 by clarifying what a healthy emitted package would need to reveal.


Why this matters

The bootstrap generator contract explains what a future generator may receive and emit.

The next question is narrower:

what must the emitted output itself reveal so it stays inspectable, traceable, and reviewable?

Without an output contract, a generator may technically follow the right inputs while still producing bundles that are too opaque to trust.


Core idea

A delivery output should be understood as:

a reviewable package whose contents, origin, and authority boundaries remain explicit

That means an emitted output should always make clear:

  • what was generated
  • which choices shaped it
  • which docs remain canonical
  • what is framework-derived versus project-local
  • whether the output is ready for adoption or still needs review

Minimum output sections

A healthy Alpha 7 delivery output should be able to communicate at least these sections or their equivalents.

1. Output identity

The output should identify itself.

Examples:

  • package name
  • output purpose
  • delivery surface

2. Source choices

The output should expose the choices that shaped it.

At minimum:

  • selected preset
  • selected adoption mode
  • selected delivery surface

3. Canonical references

The output should point back to the authoritative docs that still define meaning.

Examples:

  • roadmap or distribution docs
  • starter-pack guides
  • handoff or inference docs when relevant

4. Generated contents

The output should list what it actually contains.

Examples:

  • emitted files
  • starter-pack subset
  • example bundle
  • review notes

5. Boundary notes

The output should state what it does not redefine.

Examples:

  • does not replace canonical docs
  • does not infer project-local policy
  • does not silently enable future layers

6. Review posture

The output should state whether review is still expected before operational adoption.


Minimum contract fields

A future delivery output contract should be able to express at least:

  • output_name
  • output_purpose
  • delivery_surface
  • preset
  • adoption_mode
  • canonical_refs
  • generated_contents
  • boundary_notes
  • review_status
  • review_notes

This is still a doc-level contract. It is not yet a schema.


Authority rule

A generated output must not become the new source of truth by accident.

That means every healthy output should make explicit:

  • what remains authoritative in the repo
  • what is only a packaged derivative
  • what still needs human interpretation or local choice

If the output hides those distinctions, it is no longer a safe delivery artifact.


Locality rule

A healthy output should preserve the distinction between:

  • framework-derived content
  • project-local selections
  • future-facing optional layers

That means the output should not silently install local rules, future packs, or stronger automation assumptions without explicit visibility.


Review rule

A healthy delivery output should carry a visible review posture such as:

  • review required before adoption
  • review complete, ready for local adaptation
  • illustrative only, not for direct operational use

This keeps adoption explicit instead of implied.

See:

  • examples/delivery/reviewable-generated-bundle.md

What this contract should not include yet

This first output contract should not yet define:

  • a file format standard
  • a manifest schema
  • environment-specific output syntax
  • automatic validation semantics
  • delivery-side policy enforcement

Those belong later, if they become necessary.


Relationship to other Alpha 7 artifacts

This document sits after:

  • docs/bootstrap-principles.md
  • docs/delivery-tooling-boundaries.md
  • docs/bootstrap-output-examples.md
  • docs/bootstrap-generator-contract.md

In simple terms:

  • principles define posture
  • boundaries define stop lines
  • output examples define healthy shapes
  • generator contract defines future generator IO
  • this delivery output contract defines what the emitted package itself must reveal

Good signs

A first Alpha 7 delivery output contract is healthy when:

  • outputs remain smaller than their ambition
  • outputs are clearly tied to preset, mode, and surface
  • authority boundaries remain visible
  • review posture is explicit
  • the contract still makes sense without any implementation yet
  • the docs no longer imply that a real output generator must exist before 1.0

Suggested next reading

  • docs/bootstrap-principles.md
  • docs/delivery-tooling-boundaries.md
  • docs/bootstrap-output-examples.md
  • docs/bootstrap-generator-contract.md
  • examples/delivery/reviewable-generated-bundle.md
  • docs/distribution-presets-adapters.md

Was this page helpful?